Back to Blog
AI ToolsJune 22, 20258 min read

GitHub Copilot Free Alternatives: 5 Better Options for Developers in 2025

GitHub Copilot costs $10–$19/month. These 5 free alternatives give you AI code completion in VS Code, JetBrains, and Cursor — with zero monthly cost.

Why Developers Are Moving Away From GitHub Copilot

GitHub Copilot is the most well-known AI coding assistant. At $10/month for individuals and $19/month for business, it is also one of the most expensive recurring costs for independent developers and small teams. After the free trial ends, the real question hits: is it worth paying for, or are there free alternatives that are just as good?

In 2025, the answer is clear — there are at least five free alternatives that match or exceed Copilot's quality for most coding tasks. I have tested all of them. Here is the honest breakdown.

1. Continue.dev + FreeLLMKeys (Best Overall Free Alternative)

Cost: Free
IDE support: VS Code, JetBrains
Models: GPT-4o, Claude Opus, DeepSeek, Gemini — your choice

Continue.dev is an open-source VS Code and JetBrains extension that adds Copilot-style inline completions, a chat sidebar, and code edit commands. It is OpenAI-compatible, which means you can plug in any API key from FreeLLMKeys and use whatever model you want.

Setup in 3 steps:

  1. Install the Continue extension from the VS Code marketplace
  2. Open Continue settings (~/.continue/config.json)
  3. Add this configuration:
{
  "models": [
    {
      "title": "GPT-4o (Free)",
      "provider": "openai",
      "model": "gpt-4o",
      "apiKey": "sk-your-freellmkeys-key",
      "apiBase": "https://aiapiv2.pekpik.com/v1"
    },
    {
      "title": "Claude Opus 4 (Free)",
      "provider": "openai",
      "model": "claude-opus-4-7",
      "apiKey": "sk-your-freellmkeys-key",
      "apiBase": "https://aiapiv2.pekpik.com/v1"
    }
  ],
  "tabAutocompleteModel": {
    "title": "DeepSeek Coder",
    "provider": "openai",
    "model": "deepseek-chat",
    "apiKey": "sk-your-freellmkeys-key",
    "apiBase": "https://aiapiv2.pekpik.com/v1"
  }
}

After saving, you get GPT-4o for chat, Claude for code review, and DeepSeek for inline autocomplete — all free, all using keys from FreeLLMKeys.

2. Cursor IDE Free Tier + Custom API

Cost: Free tier available
IDE support: Standalone (built on VS Code)
Models: Any OpenAI-compatible model

Cursor is a full VS Code fork with deeply integrated AI features — inline edit (Cmd+K), chat sidebar (Cmd+L), and whole-codebase context. The free tier comes with 2000 autocomplete completions and 50 slow requests per month. But with a custom API key, you bypass these limits entirely.

In Cursor Settings → Models → Override OpenAI Base URL, enter https://aiapiv2.pekpik.com/v1 and paste a FreeLLMKeys key. You now have unlimited AI completions for the cost of refreshing a free key every 48 hours.

Cursor's AI is more deeply integrated than Continue.dev — it can read your entire project and make multi-file edits. For complex refactors and bug investigations, it is noticeably better than Copilot's single-file awareness.

3. Codeium (Completely Free, No Key Needed)

Cost: Free forever
IDE support: VS Code, JetBrains, Neovim, Vim, Emacs, and more
Models: Codeium's own proprietary model

Codeium offers free inline code completion with no usage limits and no credit card. The quality is good — not as strong as GPT-4o, but better than Copilot's older Codex-based completions for many languages. It supports 70+ programming languages.

The limitation: Codeium uses its own model. You cannot switch to GPT-4o or Claude. For most inline autocomplete use cases, this is fine. For complex reasoning and code review, it falls short of the frontier models.

Use Codeium for fast, zero-friction autocomplete. Pair it with Continue.dev + FreeLLMKeys for the chat/reasoning tasks Codeium cannot handle.

4. Void Editor (Open-Source Cursor Alternative)

Cost: Free and open-source
IDE support: Standalone (VS Code fork)
Models: Any OpenAI-compatible model, local models via Ollama

Void is an open-source alternative to Cursor built on the VS Code engine. It has a similar feature set — inline edits, chat, codebase indexing — but runs fully locally and lets you use any API endpoint. Configure it with your FreeLLMKeys base URL and you have a privacy-friendly, fully-featured AI IDE at zero cost.

Void is newer and rougher around the edges than Cursor, but it is improving fast and is a good choice if you want open-source with no vendor lock-in.

5. Tabnine Free Tier

Cost: Free tier available
IDE support: VS Code, JetBrains, Neovim, Eclipse, and more
Models: Tabnine's own models (can run locally)

Tabnine has been around longer than Copilot and offers a free tier with basic completions. Its standout feature is the ability to run the model locally — no data leaves your machine. For developers working with sensitive codebases (healthcare, finance, legal), this privacy guarantee matters.

The free tier model is smaller and less capable than GPT-4o for complex tasks, but for routine autocomplete in familiar languages, it is solid.

My Recommended Setup (Zero Cost, Maximum Power)

Here is the exact setup I use:

  1. Cursor IDE with a FreeLLMKeys key for the primary coding environment — best inline edit and codebase chat
  2. Codeium as a secondary autocomplete plugin inside regular VS Code when I need the vanilla editor
  3. Continue.dev in JetBrains for Java/Kotlin work

Total monthly cost: $0. Total time to refresh a FreeLLMKeys key when it expires: 30 seconds. The quality across all these tools — powered by GPT-4o and Claude via FreeLLMKeys — is objectively better than GitHub Copilot's single-model approach.

GitHub Copilot made AI coding accessible. In 2025, it is no longer the only option — or the best free one.

F
FreeLLMKeys Team
Building tools for the AI developer community